I think it was merely a case of both guys

By: Java

Either being fa ryu. And the Dodgers being asked to spend way too much money on years 3-5 when he’d be too old. Or in the case of maeda having to hold a roster spot for a tweener who probably can’t give you a 162 game season as a starter and who was affordable enough to get decent return. Graderol. He didn’t have a big contract. Incentive laden. And his numbers indicated he probably could be replaced by May. Urias gonsolin. And mostly he was. He was a valuable postseason bullpen guy but so is graderol and buster is younger and cheaper. If the Dodgers were gonna look bad in these moves it was going to be this year. After this both guys get older. Wrong side of 30
Post Please Log in OR Register for an account before posting.