and New Jersey? How about

By: Old Hickory Trojan

the United States internment and loss of legally owned property in WWII? Care to explain how that was any different? How about even California, Oregon keeping slaves as part of the Union? Were they any better? You keep leveling charges against the South and totally ignore the fact that slavery was kept in the North but that was OK. Hypocrit. At least Mississippi didn't pretend to be one thing and actually be another...can't say that about the North...look it up..your bigotry is beyond belief to ignore the reality that the North has states with slaves during the war. 

Post Please Log in OR Register for an account before posting.