Thats my point...

By: Old Hickory Trojan



You have it if you need it but never itrained on it, never took classes on handling it but if you need to you'll use it... and my post was that ACB wouldn't be muy pick I preferred Cruz...I mentioned the only thing close to a second Amendment case she ever ruled on was giving gun rights back to felons. Thats not much of a ruling to prove shes a strong second amendment candidate..hell Diane Feinstine used to carry a 38 snubnose...and that dumbarse Michael Moore had a gun until folks found out and he claimed he got rid of it...regardless I never said she was anti -Second I said thier are stronger candidates if it's about the second....one good thing she said during the confirmation that even though she admires Scalia she wouldn't say she agreed on everyhing he ever said...because my hangup with Scalia was he said "infringed" could be interpreted to mean infringed is not an absolute and in certain situations they can be infringed...that is not the statement of a true Constitutionalist and if she agrees with Scalia then she is not a true constitutionalist either...

But her statements in defining what an originalist and text judge made it a lot clearer that if she meant what she said she would disagree with Scaia..at least I. hope so...but she also made statements that were a bit contrary to that position when talking about the Constitution that were not in line with it but were accepted and a reversal might create tremendous harm to the citizens that compassion had to play into a decision so not sure I agree with thatand then contradicted that a bit when she said she is not there to make laws just rule on whether they aling with the Constitution or not...so IMHO she gave herself some room to manuever...Cruz on the other hand I beleive is a strict constitutionalist...

Post Please Log in OR Register for an account before posting.