This is Painter's 19th season at Purdue. He's won a whopping 4 conference championships. The Dodgers have finished 1st 12 out of 12 non-Covid seasons in a row and didn't win a Championship in those seasons.
Which is worse?
Purdue has been a nice little Top 25 program (some seasons better than others) until the past 2 seasons plus this one.
That's my point. Despite having a dozen 25 plus win seasons and a few around 29. They've won 2. Count them 2 big ten tournaments in the last 25 years. Two conference championships. Not 4.
And one of them? Was last year when the 1 seed boilers lost to a 16 seed to open the match madness. I rest my case
In case you don't know, most Top 25 teams have shiny OOC records by the time league play starts.
Most teams load up on cupcakes and play in a few tournaments. Until the last few years, nobody was saying Purdue was going to win the Natty based on their record in November/December. It's always Duke, UNC, Arizona, Gonzaga, MSU, and a few times UCLA.
You don't know what you're talking about as usual.
3 seasons ago they finished 18-10
4 seasons ago they finished 16-15
Nobody was talking about them winning a Natty in either season.
The last 2 seasons they were highly ranked heading into January. So based on 2 seasons of not winning it all, they are somehow being singled out as December Champions? It doesn't make any sense. Many other teams like Arizona and Gonzaga are more of a December Champion than Purdue.
Purdue is a program that is just usually pretty good but in the past 2 seasons plus this one, have been very highly ranked.
Coach K at Duke didn't win a Natty in the vast majority of his career and he usually had a top 5 team. Winning a Natty is not easy, bro.
Saying they're December champs is implying they are perennially the top team a few months into the season, which they haven't been except the past few years. Being ranked 18th, 20th, or 25th in December would not make them December champions. It would make them just another Top 25 program.
Contrast with the Dodgers who have finished in 1st place every single year for over a decade and have only their Mickey Mouse championship to show for it. They are the September Champions.
You're creating segues that don't exist. In mlb the team with the best record never wins the ws. Look it up. In the last 20 years it's happened like 7 times. Everyone knows baseball playoffs are broken
Back to purdue. Yes. We are talking about the present Einstein. The last several years. And yes this has been the Purdue deal the last 4-5 years. I realize you just started following them but I assure you. This is the pattern. Every. Single. Year. And yep been that way all this decade. Covid years excepted but those were messed up for a lot of programs.
Purdue is a great October to December team. Sometimes even a solid big ten season team. The minute it comes to tournament play? Both their own and ncaa? Dogs. Look it up. Purdue has probably been the best big ten team the last 20 years and look up to see how many times they've won the conference tourney. I'd be shocked if it's been more than once.
Final dig. Their women's team basically started and built their program. And accomplished more in that span than Purdue has in their whole history. And yes I go way back. Water Jordan. Jerry schicting. Joe Barry Carrol. Rick mount. Terry dischinger. Bruce Parkinson. Eugene Parker. Glenn Robinson. I know the whole history. Don't care. They are who they are.
I told you guys back in January. Real Deal. Good to see Java finally realized what I knew months ago. Ha ha
The only team that can beat them is UConn and vice versa.
This is Painter's 19th season at Purdue. He's won a whopping 4 conference championships. The Dodgers have finished 1st 12 out of 12 non-Covid seasons in a row and didn't win a Championship in those seasons.
Which is worse?
Purdue has been a nice little Top 25 program (some seasons better than others) until the past 2 seasons plus this one.
You don't know what you're talking about as usual.
3 seasons ago they finished 18-10
4 seasons ago they finished 16-15
Nobody was talking about them winning a Natty in either season.
The last 2 seasons they were highly ranked heading into January. So based on 2 seasons of not winning it all, they are somehow being singled out as December Champions? It doesn't make any sense. Many other teams like Arizona and Gonzaga are more of a December Champion than Purdue.
Purdue is a program that is just usually pretty good but in the past 2 seasons plus this one, have been very highly ranked.
Coach K at Duke didn't win a Natty in the vast majority of his career and he usually had a top 5 team. Winning a Natty is not easy, bro.
Bobby Knight comments on Purdue.
They are the greatest October to December dynasty ever known to the sport