is the squat an idiot? he seems like he's one of those guys or gals that never got attention from its mommy... "Hey look at me, look, look, i'm here, see what I said? I'm saying Ucla should hang a 2 banner, look at me, please respond, I'm a fawking dork, alert alert, please talk to me" lol fawking idiots
should have been 2... fawkers.... Not TOP 25? wtf? Beat the 1 seed, 2 seed, Michigan St. and basically beat the 30-0 Zags.. not 25 in the country my azzzz...
All things considered, that ain't bad. But they didn't even crack the top 25 in the AP poll. That's kind of dumb. I know they didn't have the greatest regular-season, but you'd think they'd take the tournament into consideration. I guess not. In the final analysis I guess it doesn't really matter much.
EDIT: not entirely sure that the final AP poll has come out yet, just for the record. I may have been reading an earlier poll. Whatever. Like I said, doesn't matter much at this point.
BTW Gonzaga was overall #1 seed. Baylor was the overall #2 but also a #1 regional seed. These are Just facts that by playing Michigan BEFORE these two it is an easier draw. For being NCAA tourney “heavyweights” why is this so hard to understand???
@Pasadena Trojan what is your deal? UCLA won 5 post-season games, and winning OT games takes guts and determination. They just came up short, as 67 out of 68 teams in the tournament always do. And as much as you say Alabama and Michigan were subpar teams, they were still #2 and #1 seeds, and nothing you say is going to change that. It's a bit comical how you complain about an opponent having foul trouble being "favorable" for UCLA -- as if UCLA didn't have something to do with creating that advantage. And as for height, or lack thereof, it didn't seem to stop Alabama from being a #2 seed and running roughshod through the SEC. Injuries? Every team has them. UCLA was missing their best player due to injury as well, that's part of the game.
The truth is, UCLA got a lot of mileage out of this tournament, and the publicity they got is going to really pay dividends in the near future. USC did as well, but for some reason you're more bitter about the success UCLA had than you are proud about the success USC had, and I don't know why. Okay, if you want to hang onto the 4-0 record against the Bruins the past two years, yes, you have scoreboard. But the Bruins earned their accolades this tournament, and there is no denying that. I suspect you're jealous because UCLA captured the hearts of many viewers in this tournament, certainly the talking heads on TV, and USC became an afterthought after that beatdown by Gonzaga. Well, not much we can do about that now, but you need to get over it.
Not hardly, altleft,Dick, and Art...just a MENSA member who likes to keep the record straight about ucly hypocrites....hurts, eh?
is the squat an idiot? he seems like he's one of those guys or gals that never got attention from its mommy... "Hey look at me, look, look, i'm here, see what I said? I'm saying Ucla should hang a 2 banner, look at me, please respond, I'm a fawking dork, alert alert, please talk to me" lol fawking idiots
Altleftwing...I know where you can get a "we're number 2" banner made up....same place can do "we're Number 7."
should have been 2... fawkers.... Not TOP 25? wtf? Beat the 1 seed, 2 seed, Michigan St. and basically beat the 30-0 Zags.. not 25 in the country my azzzz...
All things considered, that ain't bad. But they didn't even crack the top 25 in the AP poll. That's kind of dumb. I know they didn't have the greatest regular-season, but you'd think they'd take the tournament into consideration. I guess not. In the final analysis I guess it doesn't really matter much.
EDIT: not entirely sure that the final AP poll has come out yet, just for the record. I may have been reading an earlier poll. Whatever. Like I said, doesn't matter much at this point.
They are also in good shape for next season, checking in at No. 5 in next year's 247Sports Way-Too-Early rankings.