Way too high....after watching the brutes at BAMA, UGA, ND and Ohio St have I just can't see USC surviving with the defense USC has on the field...I'd give Oklahoma and Michigan an edge as well...and I'm sure there are more I haven't seen yet..
OHT until Notre Dame wins a big game and they haven’t in 30 years I am not taking them seriously. 1-18 versus top five teams in their last 20 games. I do agree that USC is not at this time a top five team. What I saw from Notre Dame yesterday was what I saw versus Oklahoma State in the bowl game last year, zero halftime adjustments. And I totally agree big strong offensive lines will give us problems. In those games we will need some turnovers but it’s going to be a heck of a ride this years
USC doesn't have the horses to control ND's OL like Ohio St does...ND's offense doesn't need to be pretty to ram the ball down USC's throat IMHO...you don't plug the middle with a 265 pound NG like USC has as a starter..they can just wear USC down...hopefully I'm dead wrong.
RAH RAH!!
ESPN should stick to being woke and staying out of the odds business
Way too high....after watching the brutes at BAMA, UGA, ND and Ohio St have I just can't see USC surviving with the defense USC has on the field...I'd give Oklahoma and Michigan an edge as well...and I'm sure there are more I haven't seen yet..
SC has a zero chance at a natty this year.
Going to take a while to get and grow some football players. just too freaking small. sc