I see that Daniels is the favorite to win the Heisman, FWIW. Is he that much better than Penix?
I've only seen Daniels play once this year, against Ole Miss, and he was very good. I've seen Penix play several times. He sometimes makes mistakes, but he's got a hell of an arm and makes plays when it really counts.
I know some will say that a SEC QB will win it over a Pac 12 QB, because...because. Probably, given the hype machine. But UW is in the playoffs, definitely because of Penix. LSU is...not in the playoffs. I'm sure the SEC apologists will say it's because LSU had a tougher schedule, and that's probably true. But UW had to beat Nike twice, and that's no small feat.
I think the Heisman voters will give it to Daniels because he's black.
Nix is considered a dark horse at this point, but you never know. And then there is some other swinging dick whose name I've forgotten.
Without Daniels, LSU is a sub .500 team. Penix is good but JD was LSU's leading passer AND rusher.
236/327, 72.2%, 3812 yards, 40 TD 4 INT
135 carries, 1134 yards, 10 TD
307/466, 65.9%, 4218 yards, 33 TD, 9 INT
29 carries, -18 yards, 3 TD
Even in a down year, SEC is still stronger than the Pac-12, especially at the top. UGA/Bama/Ole Miss/LSU/Missouri > UW/UO/Arizona/Oregon St/Utah
No. He has better stats in a down SEC.
LSU played 2 teams of note this year and lost both. Stats are worthless if they don't translate into victories (are your ears burning, LR and CW?).
Penix should rightly win the HT. His team went undefeated in the toughest conference in cfb this year and he was the main cog that made that possible. He will be the top draft pick next april.
end of story.