So what's different about the Trojan's Red Zone D ?
Clearly, it's not the same D they run across the other 80 yards of field.
I may share my opinion later, but right now, looking for what other's might be seeing.
Attn: if you consistently laugh at your own jokes, this thread is not for you.
You need to log into the Class Clown Forum.
Everyone else is welcome to contribute. Cheers!
It’s magic. sc
I heard something interesting from a former Trojan defensive player on this very topic. He believes the mentality of the defense (individually and collectively) has to change outside of the red zone, further commenting how he has seen the exact same problem with other defenses he has been a part of. He added that the focus and sense of urgency needs to increase, especially on those 3rd downs around the middle of the field and not just within the red zone. Our defensive players need to learn to play with a balance of focus and controlled rage on all plays…. “Get off the f’n field!”
I’m not articulating this the same way he did, but it‘s basically what I recall hearing after he explained his answer on the subject. Personally, I believe it’s a little more complicated, however, I’ll leave it to someone who actually played at this level.
Less Space to protect. deception doesn’t work on goal line. Taking advantage of over pursuit is harder to do. Guesses on my part.
what I know isn that for years usc wasn’t anything special dkwn there. And on offense they wasted many red zone opportunities. Other teams got 7. Usc got 3. Or 0. This usc team cashes in. A lot And seems to make enough big plays that they’re starting to believe they’re tough in tight space