I think that's too much. They are saying SJSU is better than Stanford. USC was "ok" against SJSU and SJSu was playing it's second game. Big leaps between game 1 and 2. Stanford always plays awful their first game, and they usually get better from there. Stymie is an awful coach. Ruined what Harbaugh built. I think USC wins by 7-10 and it's an ugly game. I don't think USC convinces anyone. Hope I am wrong. I don't like the WR yet outside of London. I like the Ingram kid better than Stepp. Carr is not missed. The line is pretty awful. I was definitely impressed with the D. The SJSU QB got rid of the ball quickly. I don't think Stanford will.
SC - do you remember when USC was -41 vs. stanford? that was funny.. then they played again a year later and USC was -24 or something... Pete has so many -20 to -40 favorite losses against poor azzz teams.. We'd be rich if we could go back and time and just bet against Pete whenever he was a big favorite.
@firenze5 he only lost against horrific teams..... (Minus Texas)... that was SC and Pete's most important game of his career. You guys were saying that was the best team in history but couldn't beat a one man team in LA. I actually think USC had the talent to be the best in history that year but never thought Pete was a great X's and O's coach... Great recuriter. Fun guy... whatever. He lost as big favorites to UCLA, Ferd, Oregon St all costing him national titles.. The 13-9 loss to ucla kept you out of a Natty title game and the team you would have played was shitty.. It was a big 10 team SC would have played.. Pete won a lot of games but man was he close to doing something like Saben is doing now.
take the points. if you are a gambler. easy money.
no way in hell fat boy covers. no freaking way.
USC's has top flight receivers and what looks like a well coached secondary , but it's lines SUCKS , offense worse than defense, quarterback takes hits, and the team has very little discipline or a gameplan on either side of the ball that makes any sense or seems able to adjust to anything. Lard ass keeps starting inferior players. wash rinse repeat.
I don't bet myself. but giving Hugs 17.5 points is just stupid. sc
USC will kill Stanford, will be a blow out, Drake London will catch for over 200, 3 TD's, bank it.
SJSU is currently better than Stanford
13 take usc 17 take Stanford
Taking Stanford. Easy $. McKee will throw a couple of tds.
I think that's too much. They are saying SJSU is better than Stanford. USC was "ok" against SJSU and SJSu was playing it's second game. Big leaps between game 1 and 2. Stanford always plays awful their first game, and they usually get better from there. Stymie is an awful coach. Ruined what Harbaugh built. I think USC wins by 7-10 and it's an ugly game. I don't think USC convinces anyone. Hope I am wrong. I don't like the WR yet outside of London. I like the Ingram kid better than Stepp. Carr is not missed. The line is pretty awful. I was definitely impressed with the D. The SJSU QB got rid of the ball quickly. I don't think Stanford will.
17 1/2 is too many and Stanford always points to USC but to have any chance they have to run better
SC - do you remember when USC was -41 vs. stanford? that was funny.. then they played again a year later and USC was -24 or something... Pete has so many -20 to -40 favorite losses against poor azzz teams.. We'd be rich if we could go back and time and just bet against Pete whenever he was a big favorite.
take the points. if you are a gambler. easy money.
no way in hell fat boy covers. no freaking way.
USC's has top flight receivers and what looks like a well coached secondary , but it's lines SUCKS , offense worse than defense, quarterback takes hits, and the team has very little discipline or a gameplan on either side of the ball that makes any sense or seems able to adjust to anything. Lard ass keeps starting inferior players. wash rinse repeat.
I don't bet myself. but giving Hugs 17.5 points is just stupid. sc
Wow I’ll take Stanford and all those points. SC will win but they have always had trouble with Stan at the Coliseum.