apparently SC's coaches and admin had no idea that Rolandwallace had been suspended for the last half of AZ's game and brawl with asu last season. They found out about it after last weeks game. At least that's their story. He is sitting out first half today. I think they should have sat him for a whole game as some kind of self spanking the NCAA requires.
I had no idea the half game suspension rule extended to the next season. And I had no idea it would follow a kid to a new school. The kid probably didn't either. Seems like it was simply missed . It's not like their was any cheating (intent) involved . It's not like SC lied about it or tried to cover it up. BUT Rules are rules. If SC has to forfeit, then it has to forfeit. Probably not since USC was not "notified" about the suspension. SC wasn't the only one who missed it. sc
Last week was week zero. This is week 1. He is sitting week 1. Easy stuff
Only idiots will make a big deal of this.
COHENED! Dumb biatch.
The win-at-all costs mentality bites them in the arse again. UCLA should be ranked ahead of them after this week.
apparently SC's coaches and admin had no idea that Rolandwallace had been suspended for the last half of AZ's game and brawl with asu last season. They found out about it after last weeks game. At least that's their story. He is sitting out first half today. I think they should have sat him for a whole game as some kind of self spanking the NCAA requires.
I had no idea the half game suspension rule extended to the next season. And I had no idea it would follow a kid to a new school. The kid probably didn't either. Seems like it was simply missed . It's not like their was any cheating (intent) involved . It's not like SC lied about it or tried to cover it up. BUT Rules are rules. If SC has to forfeit, then it has to forfeit. Probably not since USC was not "notified" about the suspension. SC wasn't the only one who missed it. sc