“Quiet, anonymous, and often complicitous, lawbreaking and disobedience may well be the historically preferred mode of political action for peasant and subaltern classes, for whom open defiance is too dangerous….One need not have an actual conspiracy to achieve the practical effects of a conspiracy. More regimes have been brought, piecemeal, to their knees by what was once called “Irish Democracy”—the silent, dogged resistance, withdrawal, and truculence of millions of ordinary people—than by revolutionary vanguards or rioting mobs.” – James C. Scott, Two Cheers For Anarchism
top of page
bottom of page
Not choosing a side is choosing by default. Remember The Alamo, Texit with 49 sheep to follow.
Yes, Freedom fighting, in all its forms, is a higher calling than any type of red brigade uprising, which is happening and needs to be fought with equal or superior force. We're running out of time for the indelicate, the overly optimistic, everything-will-be-alright crowd that have not chosen a side, imo.
Slippery slope, that anarchy. antifa = anarchists through masked violence. blm = anarchy through rioting and looting.
The ira's bombing in Claudy - among many other places - that killed 9 civilians. The PLO and it's resistance.
Is anarchy good when it supports our favorite causes, like the Boston Tea Party? Slippery slope, my friend.