Yes, I disagree with the fact that our republic has been run as an executive controlled administrative democracy.
And that includes the judiciary which promotes executive run administrative summary hearings under Article IV of the Constitution (Legislative Courts controlled by Congress) as judicial proceedings offering justice and rights under Article III (Constitutional Courts)
If you don't understand what I just wrote, then ask yourself how and when did Federal District 9 exert judicial control over the Republic of California?
"Territorial courts are not constitutional courts, in which the judicial power conferred by the constitution on the general government, can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They were created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations, respecting the territory belonging to the United States." - Chief Justice John Marshall
democracy is repugnant (contradictory, inconsistent, hostile) to a republic, and therefore strictly limited to legislative and judicial debate under the Constitution.
read the Leber Code and wonder why it was never rescinded
another interesting fact is the ongoing maintenance of the March 28, 1861 House of Representatives and Senate, that have never been occupied since that day
remember that, if and when, you tour the Capitol Building
in a republic the individual has rights equal to that of the state
so 20 individuals can change or sustain the political direction of the state or country
democracy has never been more than mob rule and it always suppresses the rights of the individual or twenty for the 'common good', you know, like socialism and communism
democracy is five justices telling four justices how it's going to be with the four justices have no recourse for their beliefs (politics)
which is why the Founding Fathers strictly limited the democratic process within government of the Republic
democrats of all stripes only support 'the majority' as they define it ruling as dictator over the minority
hence their need to control the media, education, and elections
anyone supporting democracy as the ruling concept in the republic of the USA is a subversive and a traitor to the Constitution, and they should be treated accordingly
The us is a republic. Do you agree w how this country has been run? If not, then what you just said is wrong. And BTW a true democracy has never been allowed to happen. There's a reason for this.
Yes, I disagree with the fact that our republic has been run as an executive controlled administrative democracy.
And that includes the judiciary which promotes executive run administrative summary hearings under Article IV of the Constitution (Legislative Courts controlled by Congress) as judicial proceedings offering justice and rights under Article III (Constitutional Courts)
If you don't understand what I just wrote, then ask yourself how and when did Federal District 9 exert judicial control over the Republic of California?
"Territorial courts are not constitutional courts, in which the judicial power conferred by the constitution on the general government, can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They were created in virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations, respecting the territory belonging to the United States." - Chief Justice John Marshall
democracy is repugnant (contradictory, inconsistent, hostile) to a republic, and therefore strictly limited to legislative and judicial debate under the Constitution.
carefully re-read what I wrote here and above
feel free to ask me questions if you seek clarity
Yeah, Dan needs to take a basic civics class. Dumb shit.
in a republic the individual has rights equal to that of the state
so 20 individuals can change or sustain the political direction of the state or country
democracy has never been more than mob rule and it always suppresses the rights of the individual or twenty for the 'common good', you know, like socialism and communism
democracy is five justices telling four justices how it's going to be with the four justices have no recourse for their beliefs (politics)
which is why the Founding Fathers strictly limited the democratic process within government of the Republic
democrats of all stripes only support 'the majority' as they define it ruling as dictator over the minority
hence their need to control the media, education, and elections
anyone supporting democracy as the ruling concept in the republic of the USA is a subversive and a traitor to the Constitution, and they should be treated accordingly